The Distinction Between Propaganda and Cinema

Drawing a fine line between political cinema and mere propaganda, Park Chan-wook stated:

• Artistic Expression: A work of art containing a political statement should not be viewed as an “enemy of art.” Conversely, a film that lacks a political stance should not be overlooked.
• Propaganda vs. Art: He issued a cautionary note, saying, “Even if we are to make a brilliant political statement, if it is not expressed artfully enough, it would just be propaganda.”

A Counter-Response to the Berlin Film Festival Controversy?

Park’s remarks are being seen as a response to comments made a few months ago by Berlin Film Festival Jury President Wim Wenders, who suggested filmmakers should stay out of politics. In contrast, Park Chan-wook described his role as approaching the competition with the “pure eyes of an audience member,” ready to be surprised without prejudice or stereotypes.

Demi Moore Joins the Conversation

Fellow jury member and iconic actress Demi Moore also voiced her support for freedom of expression. She noted that if artists begin to censor themselves, they risk shutting down the very core of their creativity—the place where truth and answers are discovered.

Expert Analysis: Why Park’s Stance Matters

Park Chan-wook (director of Oldboy and Decision to Leave) is renowned for weaving deep social and psychological themes into his work with high artistic flair. In an era of increasing global censorship, his stance encourages artists to keep their voices loud and authentic. It will be fascinating to see which films the jury selects for the Palme d’Or when the festival concludes on May 23.

Disclaimer: This article is based on official press conferences from the Cannes Film Festival and international media reports. The views expressed are the personal and professional perspectives of the filmmakers.

The post Cannes 2026: ‘Politics and Art Should Not Be Divided’—Jury President Park Chan-wook’s Bold Statement appeared first on Mission Ki Awaaz.